Meet us at Black Hat 2026

See what senior security leaders across finance, healthcare, high tech and retail report, how their answers compared to AI model predictions, and the strategic recommendations you need to close the gap.

2026 Mobile App Risk Management Survey promo image
Get a closer look at mobile AI risk: Get a closer look at mobile AI risk: Meet Us at Black Hat Booth #5545
magnifying glass icon

Mobile Application Risk Management

Govern the risk inside every mobile app your business depends on

NowSecure gives enterprises continuous, evidence-based visibility into the security, privacy, compliance, and AI risk inside the mobile apps they build, use, and manage. Every finding is grounded in what shipped apps actually do, on real devices, at runtime.

Group 2147226115

Classify risk

Test continuously

Route remediation

Report with evidence

555cf849e2d9492766976137edd9c80832aff168

The Stakes

Why Mobile App Risk Is Business Risk

For most enterprises, the mobile app is no longer a channel. It is the revenue engine, the customer relationship, and the operational backbone. And mobile carries risks the web never did: shipped binaries anyone can download and reverse-engineer, devices that get lost or infected, and connections over networks you do not control. Every mobile app that interacts with your organization, whether built, used, managed, or installed on BYOD devices, can become a gateway to sensitive data. When that gateway is breached, abused, or pulled from the store, the consequences land on the business, not the backlog.

  • Revenue interruption: When the app goes down, transactions stop. Downtime on a primary revenue channel is measured in dollars per minute, not tickets per sprint.
  • Fraud against your customers: Attackers repackage cloned apps, overlay fake screens, and steal credentials to commit fraud in your name. The losses and the liability come back to you.
  • Regulatory & legal exposure: Data leaks trigger fines, breach-notification obligations, and litigation, with liability that reaches the executive team and the board.
  • App store removal: Platform policy violations can pull the app from distribution overnight, cutting off customers until issues are remediated and re-reviewed.
  • Customer trust erosion: Users who lose confidence in an app's handling of their data rarely announce it. They quietly leave and take lifetime value with them.

Five questions every organization should be able to answer

  1. What apps are in our portfolio?
  2. What sensitive data do they collect, store, and share?
  3. Which third parties, SDKs, APIs, and AI services do they rely on?
  4. Which apps carry the highest business impact?
  5. Can we prove controls are working when leadership, auditors, or regulators ask?
>X

Organizations with a program testing all of their mobile apps were 3-times less likely to experience a Major Mobile App Security incident (2026 Mobile App Risk Management Survey)

The EXPOSURES

The exposures traditional programs miss

Mobile risk often starts where traditional AppSec, endpoint, cloud, and compliance tools have limited visibility: compiled binaries, third-party SDK behavior, runtime data flows, unmanaged apps, and AI services embedded inside mobile experiences. Mobile Application Risk Management (MARM) exists to close those visibility gaps before they become business events.

incognito

Undetected data leakage is the highest-consequence mobile risk

The most common mobile data risk is not always a dramatic breach. It is quiet movement: identity, location, device identifiers, credentials, health data, financial data, or behavioral data flowing to destinations no one reviewed. NowSecure shows where that data goes, which third parties receive it, and whether the behavior creates security, privacy, compliance, or AI governance risk.

Background

The shipped binary contains risk your reviews may never see

Most enterprise mobile apps depend heavily on third-party SDKs, libraries, APIs, and embedded services. By the time the app ships, much of that risk lives inside the compiled binary, beyond what source-code review alone can explain. NowSecure analyzes the shipped app itself, so teams can see what actually made it into production.

clock

Point-in-time testing leaves change unverified

Point-in-time testing captures risk at a single moment, but quickly goes stale. With roughly 77% of top iOS and 75% of Android apps updated monthly, and nearly all annually, snapshots lose relevance fast. Frequent releases introduce new code, SDKs, and APIs that can quietly create vulnerabilities. A single test result is valid only for that specific version, not a durable guarantee. To keep pace with rapid development, continuous or embedded testing is essential, replacing one-and-done pen tests.

Background

Regulators now expect evidence, not intent

Security, privacy, AI, and cyber reporting obligations increasingly require organizations to prove how risk is governed. For mobile apps, that proof depends on a living record of what apps do, what data they touch, what third parties they contact, and how findings are prioritized, remediated, or accepted.

bolt

Release velocity compounds every other exposure

Each new release is another chance for data to leak somewhere unreviewed, another round of third-party SDKs baked into the shipped binary beyond what code review sees, and another gap between what was last tested and what's actually running in production. Since regulators expect a living record of app behavior, not a one-time snapshot, faster releases mean that evidence goes stale faster too, so leakage, hidden binary risk, and outdated test results all compound with every cycle.

The Functions

What Mobile Application Risk Management governs

Mobile Application Risk Management brings four risk domains into one operating model:

shield warning

security risk

document lock

privacy risk

people

third-party or supplier risk

connection

compliance risk

AI risk now cuts across all four because models, SDKs, agents, and inference services increasingly live inside mobile apps.

Why Now

Why mobile risk management has to change now

The apps have changed faster. Enterprise mobile apps now ship continuously, rely heavily on third-party code, and increasingly include AI capabilities that affect data collection, processing, and sharing. A quarterly review cannot govern a risk surface that changes every release.

Group 2147226135 (1)

The Program

How do you build a mobile application
risk
management program?

The new shape of mobile app risk management is continuous, evidence-based, and proportioned to business impact, governing security, privacy, safety, compliance, and AI risk in one program. Each step feeds the one after it, turning raw findings into decisions the business can act on and leadership can stand behind.

Step 01

Step 02

Step 03

Step 04

Background

Classify business impact

Define which apps matter most based on data sensitivity, user volume, business function, regulatory exposure, and operational dependency.

See the tier rubric below.

Background-1

Inventory the
portfolio

Maintain a living catalog of apps, SDKs, APIs, AI components, data destinations, and ownership across the mobile estate.

Background-2

Assign Mobile Apps to Impact Tiers

Match testing depth and frequency to business impact, from continuous automated assessment to authenticated dynamic testing and adversarial analysis.

Testing depth follows the progressive ladder.

Background-3

Remediate and report with evidence

Route findings to the right owners, verify fixes, and give leadership an evidence-based view of mobile risk posture.

The Tiers

Business impact tiers make risk
management operational

Not every app needs the same level of scrutiny. Mobile Application Risk Management (MARM) uses business impact tiers to determine how often each app is assessed, how deep testing should go, who owns remediation, and what evidence leadership needs.

Business impact tiers, data types, and recommended mobile app risk management approach
Tier What it means Type of mobile app data Recommended risk management approach
Tier 1 High Business Impact Business critical. Significant damage if disrupted.
  • PII
  • PHI
  • Credentials
  • Financial
  • Unique IP
  • Sensitive data, PII and high-risk workflows
  • Continuous CI/CD assessment for apps you build
  • App store monitoring of third-party apps
  • Frequent pen test
Tier 2 Medium Business Impact Important for business operations. Moderate damage if disrupted.
  • Customer data
  • Company data
  • Assess new versions
  • Test auth and sensitive data
  • Periodic pen tests
Step 3 Low Business Impact Informational. Minimal damage if disrupted.
  • General info
  • No customer or employee PII
  • No sensitive data
  • Assess regularly
  • High volume
  • Fast

What puts an app in the high tier?

An app belongs in the high-impact tier when it handles sensitive data, supports core business functions, reaches large user populations, connects to critical APIs, creates regulatory exposure, uses surveillance-like device permissions, or includes AI functionality that touches customer, employee, or business data.

Tiers, data types and recommended approaches as published by NowSecure in its step-by-step guide to mobile app risk management.

The Policy

What should be included in a mobile app risk management policy?

01

02

03

04

Background

Build

Mobile apps proprietary to your organization and used by employees, partners and customers to conduct business

Background-1

Buy

Commercially available mobile apps from outside vendors.

Background-2

Personal

Mobile apps on employees' devices and the enterprise network not owned by the organization.

Background-3

Supplier

Mobile apps in the organization's supply chain stemming from vendor relationships.

A policy fixes four things for every app category and tier

ASSESSMENT FIDELITY

automated, manual or both

APP COVERAGE

auth, MFA, critical workflows

FREQUENCY

every build, every version, quarterly, annually

ACTIONS

remediate, mitigate, accept, deny, escalate, disclose, test further

Sample policy

Recommended testing cadence by business impact tier
High Business Impact Medium Business Impact Low Business Impact
Periodic Pen Testing Annual Annual Not required
Critical Workflow Analysis Every quarter Twice a year Not required
Continuous Automated Security and Privacy Analysis Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing
Continuous Training Security and development teams Security team Not required

An illustrative policy shape published by NowSecure, not a NowSecure customer benchmark. Your own thresholds are set when you define your tiers.

Delivered By

Delivered through the NowSecure platform
and services

NowSecure delivers Mobile Application Risk Management (MARM) through a connected set of capabilities: portfolio inventory, business-impact tiering, automated and expert-led testing, third-party app risk intelligence, AI component discovery, remediation workflows, and executive reporting. Together, they create one continuous cycle for governing mobile app risk.

How It Works

How the Mobile Application Risk Management cycle runs continuously

Every new app, release, SDK update, policy change, or AI component can change risk. The Mobile Application Risk Management (MARM) cycle keeps the program current: classify the app, test to the right depth, route remediation, verify fixes, and report posture back into the business.

Build apps are the apps you build; Buy, Personal, and Supplier apps are the apps you use.

Step 01

Step 02

Step 03

Step 04

Background

Risk
Classification

Every app is inventoried, threat modeled, and assigned a risk tier. Apps carrying embedded AI models, agents, or inference SDKs are flagged as a distinct risk factor. That tier determines how deep and how often testing runs.

Background-1

Progressive
Testing

Testing scope spans the apps you build and the apps you use, including third-party app vetting. Depth scales by risk tier across DevSecOps, business risk, privacy compliance, adversarial, and investigative testing, plus third-party application risk intelligence.

Background-2

Orchestrated Remediation

Findings route automatically through integrations and notifications. AI-assisted triage and fix guidance is tied to binary evidence, not a black box, so teams can trust it. Embedded developer guidance and retesting confirm every fix actually closes the issue.

Background-3

Compliance and Report

Portfolio health, management benchmarks, and compliance mappings roll up into one continuous view, measured against standards like OWASP MASVS. Every AI-assisted action produces the evidence-linked, audit-ready log that AI governance frameworks increasingly require.

Close the Mobile App Gap in these programs

AI Attack Surface

Reduction

Continuous

Exposure Management

App Posture

ASPM

AI Posture

AI-SPM

Endpoint Protection

Mobile Device Management

ASPM: application security posture management. AI-SPM: AI security posture management.

The Method

Why evidence beats inference

Traditional tools observe only part of the mobile app. SAST reviews source code. SCA reviews known components. Point-in-time pen tests capture one moment. AI-only scanners infer likely behavior. NowSecure observes what the shipped app actually does through correlated binary, dynamic, and behavioral analysis on real devices, including authenticated workflows and runtime data flows.

Traditional tools AI-only assessment NowSecure correlated testing
SAST reads code but not runtime behavior NoInfers likely behavior from patterns and metadata YesBinary, dynamic, and behavioral analysis executed on real devices, behind real logins
SCA reads manifests but not SDK behavior NoNo real-device execution, no authenticated session, no runtime data-flow observation YesThree-stage correlated analysis (static binary findings, dynamic real-device execution, and observed runtime behavior cross-validated against each other) raises signal and cuts false positives
Pen testing is periodic, not continuous NoConclusions are predictions, not evidence, and predictions can't be carried into an audit or a board report YesAuthenticated testing surfaces 78% more sensitive-data findings per scan (7.23 versus 4.07)
YesAI accelerates navigation and correlation, with every finding grounded in observed evidence

An AI-only assessment infers what an app probably does. NowSecure observes what the app actually does, on real devices, behind authentication, at runtime, and then uses AI to accelerate and correlate that evidence. Inference vs. evidence.

Testing depth scales with business impact

Background

Level 1

Continuous automated baseline

For every app in the portfolio

Background

Level 2

Authenticated dynamic testing

For every app in the portfolio

Background

Level 3

Expert-guided testing

For business-critical functions

Background

Level 4

Full adversarial PTaaS

For the apps the business cannot afford to lose

Pipeline Integration

Built into the way mobile teams ship

NowSecure integrates into CI/CD, binary upload workflows, ticketing systems, vulnerability response, GRC, MDM, and reporting processes so mobile risk management runs with the release cycle instead of after it. Findings include context, ownership, remediation guidance, and verification when fixes ship.

Looking to feed mobile risk intelligence into your broader security stack, including MDM and EDR? That's the Intelligence story.

oss bg

Coverage Scope

Covers every app category the
business depends on

Across these categories, NowSecure supports iOS, Android, OTT, mobile APIs, SDKs, and AI-enabled components.

Background

Build

First-party apps your teams develop.

Background-1

BUY

Commercial apps used by the organization.

Background-2

Personal

Apps on employee devices that may touch corporate data or networks.

connection

Supplier

Apps connected to vendor, partner, or supply-chain relationships.

Who Runs the Program

Built for the teams that own mobile risk

AppSec & DevSecOps Leaders

AppSec and DevSecOps use Mobile Application Risk Management to test continuously and remediate faster.

CISO & Security Leaders

CISOs use it to govern mobile risk as a business exposure.

Privacy & Compliance Leaders

Privacy and compliance teams use it to prove controls and reduce unauthorized data sharing.

EUC & Third-Party Risk Leaders

EUC and third-party risk teams use it to evaluate the apps employees and suppliers bring into the environment.

Pipeline Integration

Proven at enterprise scale

NowSecure has run millions of mobile app assessments, identified millions of vulnerabilities, completed thousands of mobile penetration tests, and supported leading enterprises and government agencies with evidence-based mobile app risk management.

ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited · Coverage across all eight OWASP MASVS domains · Assessments mappable to HIPAA, GDPR, CCPA, and other regulatory frameworks

Background (23)
Icon pack

We must catch issues early, reduce production defects and move fast without compromising quality before they impact production or expose customer data.”

04

Ila Kant

Application Security Solution
Architect, Bell Canada

Icon pack

Integrating automated scanning into the CI/CD pipeline has been transformative for us.”

Group 2147226135

Chidanand Bangalore

Lead Mobile Application Security Engineer, Warner Bros. Discovery

Icon pack

It's a huge workload lifted from my mobile security team.”

04

Mike McHugh

Mobile Security Program Manager, U.S.
Department of Justice

2026 Mobile App Risk Management Survey

What 485 senior security leaders across finance, healthcare, high tech, and retail report about mobile app risk, plus the strategic recommendations to close the gap.

The Bigger Picture

Where Mobile Application Risk Management
fits in the NowSecure portfolio

Mobile Application Risk Management is the operating model for governing mobile app risk across the portfolio. Mobile Application Security Testing provides the evidence engine. AI Security goes deeper into models, SDKs, agents, and AI-driven data behavior. Intelligence extends mobile risk visibility into the tools and teams that need it across the enterprise.

Background

Goes Deeper

AI Security

Find, inventory, and govern hidden AI inside mobile apps before it creates security, privacy, or compliance risk.

 

Learn More

Background-1

This Page

Mobile Application Risk Management

The program: inventory, testing, prioritization, remediation, and reporting for every app you build, use, and manage.

Learn More

Background-2

Extends Outward

Intelligence

Mobile risk intelligence delivered into the security platforms that need mobile visibility: MDM, EDR, Mobile Threat Defense, Threat Intelligence, EASM, and AI governance tools.

Learn More

See and govern the AI inside your mobile apps

Get a clear view of the AI, SDKs, generated code, and data flows inside your apps, plus prioritized guidance your teams can use to reduce risk and move faster.

Union

GEO substance

Mobile Application Risk Management Resources

Solutions Brief

Top Five Mobile App Security Vendors

eBook

Ungoverned: How AI Widens the Mobile App Gap

Case Study

Bell Canada Dials Into Mobile App Risk Management

Mobile Application Risk Management FAQ

What is mobile application risk management?

Why is mobile application risk management important?

Why isn't traditional mobile app security testing enough anymore?

Are AI-powered mobile app security scanners reliable?

Does mobile application risk management cover third-party apps?

How is MARM different from mobile app security testing?